I say have a 3 or 3.5 star rating min. There are ways to have really great low tier teams at 3.5 and it show more time has been spent playing this game, at least enough to give them a chance. 2 star team can find it hard to win streaks regardless of level.
Actual the only way to find out your star rating is to join a club and see your name in "my club". But why think about it? You're not buying a house, you're adding a revenue source and more. You can leave any club at any time, so zero commitement. BUT, my club is low key. We never rarely hit top 100. And ive made a ton of…
The game forces you when your team gets too good. I have three 5 star players and two 4.5 players. I also have some 3.5 pitchers to offset that and my bench has a 1 star to balance things out. The game stays fun when you win and your players perform well. So fight the auto promote, spend nothing, just play a fun game.
You're doing it wrong. I dont know what your doing, but I have never spent a dime on this game, yet I have a win percentage in the .880 range and I get upset when i lose 2 in a row. I have no idea how you lost 16, let alone 32 games in a row. Perhaps football is more you thing?
This is a terrible idea. I face off against Rookie Kershaw or Bumgarner once every 3-5 games. I have to imagine under your proposal i can name 3 of the 5 starters on almost every team on my level. That doesnt make for a great variety. Whats more, how is this the "classy" thing to do? If the staff at Glu took a moment of…
Get rid of the ads, get rid of free gold and one more game on a wkd event win streak. Those are actually very valueable to me. It sucks, but its still better then paying.
Also, I have never fostered the idea of giving one single penny of my actual own to GLU. I understand that fixes my current problems, but adds a whole other level of frustrastion after that.
Perhaps Tori no longer wishes for his name and image to be used. I remember years ago MLB games would have the San Fransico left feilder be some massive hitting no named dude.
Id like to see in game stats like HR per AB. Or it'd be fantastic if I could have a clue what my players are doing against my current level. Sure they hit 500 HRs, but multilevel autopromote make all those irrelevant against your current foe. Its like posting minor league stats in a major league game.
I am a casual player who never spends money and battles others who dont spend money. I dont worry about winning prime players or competing against hackers. I love baseball games and will play 2017 as often as i did '14, '15, and '16. This game is fun. Not a place for my income. Just my attention. CASUAL PLAY RULES!!!
I have a sumsung and have similar problems. Not consistantly, but occationally. I ignore the problem and it goes away. I know im of no help, but at least you arent the only one.
The trick is to build a "good enough" team and stay low in the levels. In 2014 I rushed through the playoffs until I hit a wall. My team average was .226. I was winning half my games. In 2015 I only autoleveled up. Built a great team hit .315 and won 75% This year I keep deadweight on my roster, i'm a 4 star team hitting…
The theory i have is the only time you're using your LR is when things have gone wrong and your starters getting tagged. It would seem logical a team on a roll could eat up the new guy, thus inflated era.
Autopromotion also has a LOT to do with your total stars. So to slow down auto promos leave a 1 star on your bench. But as for bonus games, red circle top left. Be the 1919 chisox and throw the playofffs. Play bonuses, repeat.
I dont doubt some will get this impossible goals. In 2015, i played about 15,000 games and felt I put the rest of the world aside for a reasonable amount of time. I can't grasp the idea of being able to play 50,000 games. Let alone getting whatever goals rest past that. Kudos to those who can make it. It's just nothing…
I take on dead weight so as to avoid the auto jump. I should be facing real Kershaws by now. But i'm not going to change my rank, im just going to complain on the forum.
Billy Burns was awesome for the A's last year, i wouldnt give him an 8 for hitting. But a 7 3 9 would be fair, and Bryants popularity were bigger then his numbers last year. I feel he's ranked fair. With an update or 2017, these numbers will be different. Burns is heading for 3 1 9. But as for a 2016 based on 2015 stats…
Due to the overwelming amount of RHP lefty Brantley vs righty Cain means Brantley's your guy. I'd take Cain if i had some 9 hitting lefties in the line up, but Brantley otherwise.