#1 Draft Scam

Comments

• gocubsgo0128 Registered Users, Member 272 Posts

  November 2016

  I think it once said that a #1 draft pick would yield a 5* player about 2% of the time so actually statically if you opened 45 you are statistically unlikely to get a 5* player

  0
• llamas Registered Users, Member 86 Posts

  November 2016

  Where did you get the 2%number from? Either way your number is wrong as well as I've now opened 58

  0
• llamas Registered Users, Member 86 Posts

  November 2016

  Final number was 73

  0
• oshkoshstarz Registered Users, Member 18 Posts

  November 2016

  I got a 5 star on my 8th try. Hope you feel better, as this even's out the percentages and is now more representative of the 2%

  0
• llamas Registered Users, Member 86 Posts

  November 2016

  you sleeping with one of the "programmers"? Atypical would be an understatement.

  0
• oshkoshstarz Registered Users, Member 18 Posts

  November 2016

  Actually, I have a degree in statistics an you're kind of a douche. All random events, as much as I hate GLU as much as you and everyone else. I know a guy who I watched get 2 signature players in 2 attempts. I was ****ed/jealous, but it happens.

  0
• Killsauce Registered Users 25 Posts

  November 2016

  i open over 200 #1draft pick almost every weekend after event.... if im lucky i get 1-2 5star players.

  0
• B1RDT0WN Registered Users 19 Posts

  November 2016

  I have received a couple great players but have probably opened hundreds to get them.

  0
• llamas Registered Users, Member 86 Posts

  November 2016

  oshkoshstarz wrote: »

  Actually, I have a degree in statistics an you're kind of a douche. All random events, as much as I hate GLU as much as you and everyone else. I know a guy who I watched get 2 signature players in 2 attempts. I was ****ed/jealous, but it happens.

  Hopefully it's not too late to get your money back. I've opened 300 in a row, with dismal results. Correct me if I'm wrong (assuming you know what you're talking about) but if you realize 250 negative results and have taken those results out of the potential universe of picks, wouldn't there be an increase in the likelihood that a preferential outcome would occur. If you had said degree you would have to agree. Additionally, they state the model they use in their last qtr stockholder meeting; I assure you it's not a random sampling. It's not nice to call people names, shame on you.

  0