Opened 45 draft picks without a 5 star, Statistically improbable- total scam. Would love to hear Glu's take on it. "our programmers are currently working on....." BS
I think it once said that a #1 draft pick would yield a 5* player about 2% of the time so actually statically if you opened 45 you are statistically unlikely to get a 5* player
Actually, I have a degree in statistics an you're kind of a douche. All random events, as much as I hate GLU as much as you and everyone else. I know a guy who I watched get 2 signature players in 2 attempts. I was ****ed/jealous, but it happens.
Actually, I have a degree in statistics an you're kind of a douche. All random events, as much as I hate GLU as much as you and everyone else. I know a guy who I watched get 2 signature players in 2 attempts. I was ****ed/jealous, but it happens.
Hopefully it's not too late to get your money back. I've opened 300 in a row, with dismal results. Correct me if I'm wrong (assuming you know what you're talking about) but if you realize 250 negative results and have taken those results out of the potential universe of picks, wouldn't there be an increase in the likelihood that a preferential outcome would occur. If you had said degree you would have to agree. Additionally, they state the model they use in their last qtr stockholder meeting; I assure you it's not a random sampling. It's not nice to call people names, shame on you.
Comments