Glu Communities
Forums Home› More Games Forums!› Tap Sports Baseball 2018› General TSB Discussion

Who would be interested in keeping track of our pulls on WOH days?

2Next

Comments

  • redlegs2018uredlegs2018u Registered Users, Member 1,048 Posts
    It looks that way, but we’re a small sample size in the grand scheme of things.  The 3 players in my club who cycled got 1 Betts, 1 Rizzo, and 8 Judges combined which skews things even more that way.  I’m getting fewer opportunities due to manually batting much more often looking for resources especially blue cash to fuel tourneys for more bonus games so I can cycle D6 the two times a week I’m hoping to accomplish.
  • PINKYSTARFISHPINKYSTARFISH Registered Users, Member 99 Posts
    Great idea to gather this info from the regulars to the forum .  I as well have been frustrated with a  lack of quality in the players I draw.  
     I pulled Mantle in September , since then, the quality players I have added were purchased .
  • Babybombers9Babybombers9 Registered Users, Member 212 Posts
    5 cycles 2 Stanton 2 judge 1 Rizzo.

    Thanks for doing this. Just because they say the odds are one thing doesn’t mean they’re being truthful. Also, if Apple requires them to be up front with us, why is it acceptable just to put “legend 100”. That’s not a full breakdown and allows them to subvert the system. I’m also wondering how they are even held accountable for these numbers? They’re making real money off people attempting to get these players who believe they have a certain shot at attaining them. These are all fair questions.
  • JEDDDOGGYJEDDDOGGY Registered Users, Member 2,460 Posts
    180 total
    ---------------
    0 - Mantle
    2 - Ruth
    1 - Nola
    9 - Betts
    111 - Judge
    31 - Rizzo
    26 - Stanton

    ** added Babybombers9
  • BigpredfanBigpredfan Registered Users 3,306 Posts
    Babybombers9 said:
    5 cycles 2 Stanton 2 judge 1 Rizzo.

    Thanks for doing this. Just because they say the odds are one thing doesn’t mean they’re being truthful. Also, if Apple requires them to be up front with us, why is it acceptable just to put “legend 100”. That’s not a full breakdown and allows them to subvert the system. I’m also wondering how they are even held accountable for these numbers? They’re making real money off people attempting to get these players who believe they have a certain shot at attaining them. These are all fair questions.
    I asked about this with the legend box for $29.99.  Here is their response 



  • dkarski87dkarski87 Registered Users, Member 3,040 Posts
    19 cycles
    1 mookie
    2 rizzo
    4 stanton
    12  judge

    Other guys in my club-
    24 cycles
    1 mookie
    4 rizzo
    6 stanton
    13 judge

    12 cycles
    4 mookies
    1 nolan
    1 rizzo
    6 judge


    "Oops we need to restart! Yeap that's 2019 for ya!"
    – The Great Houmy
  • BigpredfanBigpredfan Registered Users 3,306 Posts
    dkarski87 said:
    19 cycles
    1 mookie
    2 rizzo
    4 stanton
    12  judge

    Other guys in my club-
    24 cycles
    1 mookie
    4 rizzo
    6 stanton
    13 judge

    12 cycles
    4 mookies
    1 nolan
    1 rizzo
    6 judge


    New phone who dis?
  • JEDDDOGGYJEDDDOGGY Registered Users, Member 2,460 Posts
    235 total
    ---------------
    0 - Mantle
    2 - Ruth
    2 - Nola
    15 - Betts
    142 - Judge
    38 - Rizzo
    36 - Stanton

    ** added dkarski87's numbers
  • Wicked0WildcatsWicked0Wildcats Registered Users, Member 1,040 Posts
    The 50% Judge looks off, but not so far off as to not possibly be a statistical anomaly.

    I think the biggest thing that sticks out to me is 15 pulls of Betts and 2 combined of Mantle and Ruth.  My understanding has always been that the legends in the WOH box have an equal odds opportunity of being pulled.  That's clearly not the case.
  • MattattackMattattack Registered Users 1,971 Posts
    My main issue i guess is when they have legend players listed at a 10% percent pull with 4 of them in there.  Are we really to believe that all 4 legends have the same odds of being pulled (2.5% each).  It seems like there is always one in that group that is pulled a lot more then the others.  Yesterday it was Mookie, monday it was Rizzuto and previously guys like Holiday Baez, Holiday Trout and Holiday Ozzie Smith get pulled much more then the LLs and ATGs.  
  • MetsicansMetsicans Registered Users, Member 1,046 Posts

    1/23/19 -- 6 cycles, pulled Judge x3, Stanton x2 and Rizzo.

    On my second account, one cycle, pulled Judge.   

  • HuskerHusker Registered Users, Member 111 Posts
    1/23/19 - 11 cycles 6 Judge 4 Rizzo 1 Stanton. it's been a while since I got a top guy - always pull players I already had. Stanton was the one I got that I didn't have yesterday and he was my last cycle so only got to slow play him for about 1/2 hour.
  • JEDDDOGGYJEDDDOGGY Registered Users, Member 2,460 Posts
    252 total
    ---------------
    0 - Mantle
    2 - Ruth
    2 - Nola
    15 - Betts
    151 - Judge
    43 - Rizzo
    39 - Stanton

    ** added Metsicans and Husker
  • BlueOx8BlueOx8 Registered Users, Member 33 Posts
    8 cycles.  3 Betts 2 Stanton 2 Rizzo 1 Judge
  • MulderkenMulderken Registered Users, Member 173 Posts
    11 cycles 6 judge 1 rizzo 2 Betts 2 stanton
  • nym5fannym5fan Registered Users, Member 767 Posts
    @JEDDDOGGY
    Add 3 Betts 6 Rizzo 9 Judge 2 Staton to your tally
    From Wentz he came, he shall be returned!
  • thickagethickage Registered Users, Member 227 Posts
    1/23/19: 8 cycles; 4x Rizzo, 2x Betts, 2x Judge
  • ReclinerRecliner Registered Users, Member 114 Posts
    1/23. 9 cycles; 5x judge, 2x rizzo, 1 Stanton, 1 babe
  • Biceson44Biceson44 Registered Users, Member 79 Posts
    Rizzo x1 and Judge x2
  • OLDTIMER007OLDTIMER007 Registered Users 11 Posts
    4 cycles—pulled Stanton x2, Rizzo x1, Judge x1
  • JEDDDOGGYJEDDDOGGY Registered Users, Member 2,460 Posts
    315 total
    ---------------
    0 - Mantle
    3 - Ruth
    2 - Nola
    25 - Betts
    177 - Judge
    60 - Rizzo
    48 - Stanton

    ** added the 7 guys above 
  • nym5fannym5fan Registered Users, Member 767 Posts
    JEDDDOGGY said:
    315 total
    ---------------
    0 - Mantle
    3 - Ruth
    2 - Nola
    25 - Betts
    177 - Judge
    60 - Rizzo
    48 - Stanton

    ** added the 7 guys above 
    So between Mantle, Ruth and Nola you have a 1.5% chance to pull 1 of the 3. WOW. 
    And looks like Mantle was nearly 0% chance. I am sure someone got him.... just not in this thread yet lol. 
    From Wentz he came, he shall be returned!
  • AcesehAceseh Registered Users, Member 37 Posts
    1/23/19 4 cycles. 1 Rizzo, 1 Stanton, 1 Judge and 1 Babe
  • AcesehAceseh Registered Users, Member 37 Posts
    On a similar note, in my club yesterday we pulled 6 Yelich and no Davis. No complaint from me, free diamond level 8 for me. :) Still seemed a little odd.
  • JEDDDOGGYJEDDDOGGY Registered Users, Member 2,460 Posts
    edited January 2019
    319 total
    ---------------
    0 - Mantle
    4 - Ruth
    2 - Nola
    25 - Betts
    178 - Judge
    61 - Rizzo
    49 - Stanton

    ** added Aceseh

    We're starting to normalize a tad bit here. At one point we were nearly 2/3 Judge with way less than 10 percent for legends overall and with only 1 Ruth and 1 Nola. Right now, we're right at just under 10 percent legends (primarily Betts) and about 56% Judge. 

    It looks like the odds may be what they really say they are, but it looks like the premium legends (or ATGs in this case) are much, much rarer. Confirms what I thought. With 250 cycles since Black Friday, I'm still overdue for one though haha.
  • SakaV2SakaV2 Registered Users, Member 124 Posts
    For Wednesday the 23rd I cycled 3x = 1 Judge 1 Ruth 1 Nola
  • DPKSDPKS Registered Users, Member 57 Posts
    4 cycles. 3x judge. 1x rizzo
Sign In or Register to comment.

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register

Categories