Options

Gem Math issue?

RhystRhyst Registered Users 31 Posts
I noticed a discrepancy on percent bonus gems .... $9.99/Monthly = 480 gems (80% bonus) listed as 720 ... is my math wrong saying it should be 480+80%=864 gems ... if I am correct then each of the Higher priced ones are drastically OFF.... and should be rectified immediately



Rhyst: 7.4k Warlock

Comments

  • Options
    psyhighpsyhigh Registered Users 49 Posts
    The math is correct. If you price out how many gems you'd get if you bought a bunch of the $5 packs or subscribed, you'd find you don't get a lot less gems. The bonus is added to the purchase/subscription to give additional gems, and a higher chance of putting a bunch of money down.
    BGI IGN: LiQuiDDiGitZ Android | Guild: EXPERIENCED | Level 48 Warlock 10577 GS
  • Options
    covseicacovseica Registered Users 24 Posts
    Rhyst wrote: »
    I noticed a discrepancy on percent bonus gems .... $9.99/Monthly = 480 gems (80% bonus) listed as 720 ... is my math wrong saying it should be 480+80%=864 gems ... if I am correct then each of the Higher priced ones are drastically OFF.... and should be rectified immediately



    Rhyst: 7.4k Warlock

    what is not mentioned is the base for each pack at what bonus is applied... it is not % applied to the lower pack.
    480 = 400 base +20%
    750 = 600 base +25%
    1330 = 1000 base +33%
    3200 = 2000 base +60%

    Hope it clarifies ... and the % is mainly used as marketing strategy
    BG - FonsecaRom
    EW - FonsecaRO
  • Options
    RhystRhyst Registered Users 31 Posts
    covseica wrote: »
    what is not mentioned is the base for each pack at what bonus is applied... it is not % applied to the lower pack.
    480 = 400 base +20%
    750 = 600 base +25%
    1330 = 1000 base +33%
    3200 = 2000 base +60%

    Hope it clarifies ... and the % is mainly used as marketing strategy

    yeah kinda.... so basically -20% and you see what you truly get. it's one of those Gray area's between False Advertising and a Miscommunication
Sign In or Register to comment.