Obviously this doesn't apply to people with a team full of legends but my team is only a 4 star average currently so I'm still trying to gain every edge I can.
Anyway, I was looking over my teams batting and pitching stats and noticed some players with worse rankings actually had better in-game results over large samples (over 1,000 AB's/~200 starts).
So I'm wondering, if after a thousand games, if you had to make a decision between a pitcher with 8-8-8 stats and one with 9-9-9 stats (making these numbers up) but the 8-8-8 pitcher had a lower ERA, higher strikeout percentage, etc would you favor the 8-8-8 guy? Would you do the same with a batter with the equivilent results? Is it possible there is something about the 8-8-8 guy that makes him tougher to hit against vs a human player that isn't represented in the stats, or is it a fluke/still not a large enough sample?
0
Comments