@brenhin i agree with most of your points, however it's hard to dispute that there is definitely something weird with the voting algorithm, and Glu has never stepped in to confirm or deny anything, which is why it is easy to point fingers and glu manipulating the results. For example, the infamous perfect "60" score. How is it that almost everyone who has scored 60 will then score in the 30s or low 40s afterwards. like that is so sus to me
I can definitely see a potential problem with some votes coming back low- itâs happened to me! Iâm just saying that a lot of the time peoples looks arenât as creative as they make them out to be- along with on theme too! itâs hard to believe what people are saying when their looks donât match up with what they are claiming? I also understand theres taste levels but what Iâm visually seeing half of the time are not 50 worthy in my opinion- but who knows?
okay, I donât mean to offend anyone or say anything that will lessen on their choices on their looks but what is with all these weird conspiracies! like are people so self delusional that they think all their looks are gonna he big hits and score 50! please- letâs also not forget that your looks could be going against even better looks! maybe- JUST maybe! your looks... are just not always it and on theme? thereâs no need for all this insecurity and blaming of others/glu? itâs all based on luck because Iâve also seen PLENTY of creative and amazing looks score 30! this forum paranoia is getting too much lately, put your tin foil hat on girls! đ
Glu literally confirmed it that they use bots. What did you expect? That people would ignore it and also the fact that since a few good months the SYS has been inconsistent when it comes to scores and that looks that aren't on theme are normally the popular pick. People will put random things on their doll and that can get like 50 or even an higher score. At this point it's made clear that no matter what you wear your scores are gonna be either high or low depending on luck. It doesn't help that Glu isn't even denying nor confirming it. I remember when I once started another game on another device and starter/kash clothing items could easily get me about high 40s and 50s and never once missed on an earnable. People here are simply putting 2 and 2 together the same way we would do in real life when something isn't adding up.
okay, I donât mean to offend anyone or say anything that will lessen on their choices on their looks but what is with all these weird conspiracies! like are people so self delusional that they think all their looks are gonna he big hits and score 50! please- letâs also not forget that your looks could be going against even better looks! maybe- JUST maybe! your looks... are just not always it and on theme? thereâs no need for all this insecurity and blaming of others/glu? itâs all based on luck because Iâve also seen PLENTY of creative and amazing looks score 30! this forum paranoia is getting too much lately, put your tin foil hat on girls! đ
But let's call it insecurity when they themselves confirmed it that there's bots and that they use your in game looks in the SY. Looks that you haven't submittedÂ
I can definitely see a potential problem with some votes coming back low- itâs happened to me! Iâm just saying that a lot of the time peoples looks arenât as creative as they make them out to be- along with on theme too! itâs hard to believe what people are saying when their looks donât match up with what they are claiming? I also understand theres taste levels but what Iâm visually seeing half of the time are not 50 worthy in my opinion- but who knows?
Let's not forget the infamous 60 and after that you only get 30s or even lower. Most of the looks here are either inspired from real life musicians and artist or even just their personal vision of it yet still score as low as possible
I can definitely see a potential problem with some votes coming back low- itâs happened to me! Iâm just saying that a lot of the time peoples looks arenât as creative as they make them out to be- along with on theme too! itâs hard to believe what people are saying when their looks donât match up with what they are claiming? I also understand theres taste levels but what Iâm visually seeing half of the time are not 50 worthy in my opinion- but who knows?
iâve posted literal sh*t looks to level down, and still gotten a high score in the weeks where my scores are high... and sure, not all looks âdeserveâ a perfect score, but i donât think thatâs the only thing at play. idk i feel like thatâs a bit mean to say
I did better with lighter outfits so Ill get back to that tomorrow. Was supper busy today tbt I didnât try that much. Still ok in the rankings. You all came up with very creative looks đđĽ°
Thatâs a diamond collection outfit and it scored poorly and the other one is a fashion goal item and it still didnât do good. The votes are rigged and itâs just based on luck and if glu wants you to have good scores or not. Plus everyone thinks their own looks are a 60 cause itâs their look and style. Whatâs cute to you it wonât be to someone else. So why even say something like that when weâre on a game where we all can get the same clothing?Â
Iâm not gonna say that I donât disagree that there isnât anything suspicious with the votes results because Iâve seen plenty of my friends score really bad when they had very good looks! I myself have had plenty of bad scores since Paris- I havenât hit a 50 in a while too compared to me scoring high scores in past sys-
my first post was a joke on the amount of people creating conspiracies within the forum, clearly the jokes didnât land with people? as I said in my reply post, itâs all down to taste and every look is objective to what people like and what people donât- as I said I disagree with some people complaining that they didnât get high scores and thatâs my opinion on what they chose to style in a styling game!
hope all is well and that you choose to reread my original post, my last line within it cemented that it was written for laughs!Â
"Infamous 60" indeed. I don't even know if I should be proud of my first sixty with the score drop that almost always happens like is it even legit? Come on now.
@basak I noticed it like a week ago and was so surprised! Itâs definitely a newer addition to the closet because it wasnât in there for the last few years. PS your edit is beautifulÂ
@KaylaJ genuine questionâ were you tagged and called delusional? Cause if so, I didn't see. (the next bit is just in general, but I tagged you so I don't post twice)Â
The thing is, yes we all know the votes are rigged, both high and low ones. But some people are obviously off theme and still score high and when they score low, they blame it on the rigged system, when it's obviously not that. That's all there is.Â
@KaylaJ genuine questionâ were you tagged and called delusional? Cause if so, I didn't see. (the next bit is just in general, but I tagged you so I don't post twice)Â
The thing is, yes we all know the votes are rigged, both high and low ones. But some people are obviously off theme and still score high and when they score low, they blame it on the rigged system, when it's obviously not that. That's all there is.Â
I was not, but I am one of the people who believe in the "conspiracies" when it comes to voting. How could I not considering my doll has been found in the voting booth as much as it has been when they are not looks I submitted? Glu has never even explained how people get votes even if they submit in the final seconds or why the voting is much quicker in the final hours.
Brenhin can have an issue with people thinking they *always* deserve 50s or something, though I really don't see that, but why use the word "delusional" and claim people have tin foil hats on? It feels like it's demeaning people's real issues with the game.
Find me on FB facebook.com/jasperkkh.37669
let me know and i'll approve quicker!
IOS
Love to post looks in the 30s and get called delusional...
what I said was that people in this forum feel as tho theyâre always gonna get high scores and thatâs not the case, you clearly took this wrong because you read into it too deeply and felt as tho it had been targeted towards you! Iâve explained what I meant and people still choose to pick apart everything and ignore the point I was making- you very obviously also donât understand humour as a light joke on the end?
i mean itâs insane that people came for a girl because she chose to use her own money on submitting extra for items she chose- but someone criticises dolls reactions to low scores and itâs the same call out- as usual this exposes the issues within this forum because some people seem to take criticism that isnât praise as an insult.
@KaylaJ genuine questionâ were you tagged and called delusional? Cause if so, I didn't see. (the next bit is just in general, but I tagged you so I don't post twice)Â
The thing is, yes we all know the votes are rigged, both high and low ones. But some people are obviously off theme and still score high and when they score low, they blame it on the rigged system, when it's obviously not that. That's all there is.Â
I was not, but I am one of the people who believe in the "conspiracies" when it comes to voting. How could I not considering my doll has been found in the voting booth as much as it has been when they are not looks I submitted? Glu has never even explained how people get votes even if they submit in the final seconds or why the voting is much quicker in the final hours.
Brenhin can have an issue with people thinking they *always* deserve 50s or something, though I really don't see that, but why use the word "delusional" and claim people have tin foil hats on? It feels like it's demeaning people's real issues with the game.
i- this is way over the top. he clearly did not mean it like that. but i agree with him. this forum is always making differently conspiracies with the voting. i agree, itâs sus. but some things said on here are way over the top about the votes. he stated one of the possible factors of voting, not all!Â
Love to post looks in the 30s and get called delusional...
what I said was that people in this forum feel as tho theyâre always gonna get high scores and thatâs not the case, you clearly took this wrong because you read into it too deeply and felt as tho it had been targeted towards you! Iâve explained what I meant and people still choose to pick apart everything and ignore the point I was making- you very obviously also donât understand humour as a light joke on the end?
i mean itâs insane that people came for a girl because she chose to use her own money on submitting extra for items she chose- but someone criticises dolls reactions to low scores and itâs the same call out- as usual this exposes the issues within this forum because some people seem to take criticism that isnât praise as an insult.
Going after a new member because she bought some tickets is wrong. Plenty of us have done so, including some who say they do not and are later caught doing such. Your first post calling that out was fine. Your second post felt more like calling out people who were posting their low scores as "delusional" cause they believe in "conspiracies" and not questions we've had for years.
I'm sorry I don't see the joke in your posts, it's a forum and sometimes they will be missed, but I hope you understand that it felt like a shot at some of us who have been posting our bad scores and questioning why.
Find me on FB facebook.com/jasperkkh.37669
let me know and i'll approve quicker!
IOS
@KaylaJ I don't know if you've read the replies well but Brenhin already said he believes that the votes are rigged. The original comment is specifically for people who submit off theme looks, get low scores and then use the rigged thing as an excuse. If you don't do that, then it never was aimed at you. Also the last bit was also commented on, to try and make sure that the post comes off as a joke. Wasn't so successful apparently. Sorry Brenhin, can't be perfect with your looks and communication skills, gotta pick one đ
@KaylaJ I don't know if you've read the replies well but Brenhin already said he believes that the votes are rigged. The original comment is specifically for people who submit off theme looks, get low scores and then use the rigged thing as an excuse. If you don't do that, then it never was aimed at you. Also the last bit was also commented on, to try and make sure that the post comes off as a joke. Wasn't so successful apparently. Sorry Brenhin, can't be perfect with your looks and communication skills, gotta pick one đ
As I mentioned in the post to Brenhin I apologize if I read it the wrong way.Â
Find me on FB facebook.com/jasperkkh.37669
let me know and i'll approve quicker!
IOS
The reason why the post seemed unnecessary and aimed towards a lot of people is because pretty much everyone who has posted their looks either recreated or took inspiration from different artist which would fit the theme. The only way that it would seem that the post would be fitting is if we were talking about the voting booth in which sometimes it can be a bit of a mess. Not only that but it did seem as if it was 'attacking' people who were complaining about the votes. Of course not every single one of our looks is gonna get high 50s but I highly doubt that everyone in this forum suddenly lost their personal styling technique a few months ago
Comments
For example, the infamous perfect "60" score. How is it that almost everyone who has scored 60 will then score in the 30s or low 40s afterwards. like that is so sus to me
@asta @lulula @uglyjackie
 https://communities.glu.com/kim-kardashian-hollywood/discussion/5464851/kimstagram-concept#latest
Join the Kimmunity Discord server:
https://discord.gg/kimmunity
đź
â â â â â â â â â â Daily player on iOS! âĄ
85 level also A+++
Instagram gameplay account: basak_kkh
If you want to be friends, you can add me here:Â https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100039524040997
looks 1-8. went for a more cutesy, pop princess kinda vibe~ shame about the pants look, i really liked it.
it is a kloset item đ¤Š
You all came up with very creative looks đđĽ°
Â
Iâm not gonna say that I donât disagree that there isnât anything suspicious with the votes results because Iâve seen plenty of my friends score really bad when they had very good looks! I myself have had plenty of bad scores since Paris- I havenât hit a 50 in a while too compared to me scoring high scores in past sys-
my first post was a joke on the amount of people creating conspiracies within the forum, clearly the jokes didnât land with people? as I said in my reply post, itâs all down to taste and every look is objective to what people like and what people donât- as I said I disagree with some people complaining that they didnât get high scores and thatâs my opinion on what they chose to style in a styling game!
 https://communities.glu.com/kim-kardashian-hollywood/discussion/5464851/kimstagram-concept#latest
Join the Kimmunity Discord server:
https://discord.gg/kimmunity
having a lot of fun with this theme, here are some of my fav looks đ
Add me on facebook! đ
let me know and i'll approve quicker!
IOS
2020 Graduate of Clown College
(the next bit is just in general, but I tagged you so I don't post twice)Â
The thing is, yes we all know the votes are rigged, both high and low ones. But some people are obviously off theme and still score high and when they score low, they blame it on the rigged system, when it's obviously not that. That's all there is.Â
I was not, but I am one of the people who believe in the "conspiracies" when it comes to voting. How could I not considering my doll has been found in the voting booth as much as it has been when they are not looks I submitted? Glu has never even explained how people get votes even if they submit in the final seconds or why the voting is much quicker in the final hours.
Brenhin can have an issue with people thinking they *always* deserve 50s or something, though I really don't see that, but why use the word "delusional" and claim people have tin foil hats on? It feels like it's demeaning people's real issues with the game.
let me know and i'll approve quicker!
IOS
2020 Graduate of Clown College
i mean itâs insane that people came for a girl because she chose to use her own money on submitting extra for items she chose- but someone criticises dolls reactions to low scores and itâs the same call out- as usual this exposes the issues within this forum because some people seem to take criticism that isnât praise as an insult.
 https://communities.glu.com/kim-kardashian-hollywood/discussion/5464851/kimstagram-concept#latest
Join the Kimmunity Discord server:
https://discord.gg/kimmunity
Going after a new member because she bought some tickets is wrong. Plenty of us have done so, including some who say they do not and are later caught doing such. Your first post calling that out was fine. Your second post felt more like calling out people who were posting their low scores as "delusional" cause they believe in "conspiracies" and not questions we've had for years.
I'm sorry I don't see the joke in your posts, it's a forum and sometimes they will be missed, but I hope you understand that it felt like a shot at some of us who have been posting our bad scores and questioning why.
let me know and i'll approve quicker!
IOS
2020 Graduate of Clown College
Also the last bit was also commented on, to try and make sure that the post comes off as a joke. Wasn't so successful apparently. Sorry Brenhin, can't be perfect with your looks and communication skills, gotta pick one đ
As I mentioned in the post to Brenhin I apologize if I read it the wrong way.Â
let me know and i'll approve quicker!
IOS
2020 Graduate of Clown College